CRWV Β· CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common StockCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock
π Companies in the Neocloud segment that have already secured capacity and component orders, such as NBIS and CRWV, are likely to be major winners as hyperscaler buildout delays cause competition to stall
Companies in the Neocloud segment that have already secured capacity and component orders, such as NBIS and CRWV, are likely to be major winners as hyperscaler buildout delays cause competition to stall.
Evidence & details
- +$1.25B+ yearly debt payments
- βBankruptcy risk
- βDebt servicing
Chart
Post Timeline Β· 8 posts
@Veganhippo21 I was buying $CRWV at $34 last year, and I swing traded it at $70 this year. That being said, "u mad" doesn't help Coreweave's issue with $1.25B+ yearly debt payments. https://t.co/DrP4LIKpYm
Thesis: CoreWeave faces significant debt payment burden of $1.25B+ annually, raising solvency concerns.
Thinking about buying $CRWV on the $NVDA deal? Here's the way to think about it: A casino gives you more money, so you could take on more debt with collateral to gamble. Then all the extra money goes back to the Casino (aka. $NVDA). That doesn't make Coreweave a good long. β¦
Thesis: CoreWeave's deal with Nvidia is analogous to a casino giving more money to gamble, leading to increased debt that ultimately benefits Nvidia. CoreWeave is not a good long due to high debt and interestβ¦
@__visionxry__ Good question! As for $CRWV, $NBIS, and $IREN, I havenβt done a BOM on B300 clusters, but optical networking is probably around 10-20% of capex. I remember doing calculations and increasing InP prices by 30 times would only create a 3% marginal increase on clusteβ¦
Thesis: Discussion about InP cost impact and potential shift to custom ASICs, but no explicit thesis on any ticker.
@__visionxry__ $NBIS has a 25 million share ATM that's likely being sold on the open market. $CRWV went up 5.13%+ today while $NBIS ended the day down 3.91%. That's why I really dislike ATMs at this size. It's just basically waiting for the company to finish the ATM offeringβ¦
Thesis: NBIS has a large 25 million share ATM offering being sold on the open market, causing dilution and downward price pressure.
@LoganMacGregor9 Good question about risk, I enjoy talking about the downsides too. 1. Hyperscalers completely their own datacenter buildout with GPUs (TPUs with $GOOGL, Tranium with $AWS), energy, locations in 5+ years. This is the analogy of Qualcomm with Apple. Apple just uβ¦
Thesis: Lists four main risks for NBIS and other AI infrastructure companies: hyperscaler vertical integration, GPU depreciation, credit tightening/dilution, and overbuildout due to software efficiency breaktβ¦
@koltlj1 $ALPD took on really bad debt with junk bonds at 9.25% and is connected with $CRWV, which also has a lot of bad debt really cutting into margins/FCF + OpenAI (which also doesn't have the funds yet) taking up a lot of backlog + capacity buildout. That kind increases long β¦
Thesis: Risks highlighted for APLD due to high-interest junk bonds, connection with CRWV's bad debt, and OpenAI's capacity constraints consuming backlog.
@MEijkelenborg You're missing at scale. You can show margins at $20m Q/revenue or $105M Q/revenue but execution and margins will change once you get to the projected scale based on capacity buildout like $1B+ Q/revenue what $CRWV has.
Thesis: Scale of revenue execution is critical for data center buildout beneficiaries; $CRWV has shown margins at current revenue but future scale at $1B+ Q/revenue will determine true execution.
@Solar_Twelve I actually hit the X ticker maximum otherwise I would have talked about more stuff from $AMD to $CRWV. But yeah, Coreweave is at the center of the Neocloud trade but they have pretty toxic debt compared to NBIS or CIFR.
Thesis: Coreweave (CRWV) has toxic debt compared to peers NBIS and CIFR, making it less attractive in the Neocloud trade.
The Speed act (energy permitting reform) is a major catalyst for AI data center companies like CRWV, reducing realization risk and accelerating conversion of CapEx to FCF, more impactful than rate cuts.
source βAmazon's $10B investment in OpenAI de-risks Neocloud providers like ORCL and CRWV, and hyperscaler ASIC buildout benefits design partners like MRVL and photonics/memory companies, while NVDA loses as OpenAI diversifies away from Nvidia.
source βOpenAI's fundraising at higher valuation reduces counterparty risk for infrastructure providers like Coreweave and Oracle, benefiting neocloud companies like Nebius.
source βOverview of 10 thematic investments for 2026, focusing on evolution, disruption, and bottlenecks in soft robotics, silicon photonics (InP bottleneck), glass substrates, money movement (disruption to card networks), AI cloud layers, LLM cybersecurity, LEO space infrastructure, consumer agentic workflows, distributed computing latency, and copper interconnect life extension. Expresses bullish views on specific companies and bearish on incumbent payment networks Visa and Bank of America.
source βElon Musk's $134B lawsuit against OpenAI poses downside risk to AI stocks levered to OpenAI (AMD, CRWV, ORCL, MSFT, APLD, CORZ, RIOT) in worst-case scenario, but author expects middle ground with a large fine and MSFT stepping in, limiting contagion.
source βPersonal stock ratings with detailed commentary: Strong Buy on 14 stocks (SNAP, META, MU, TSM, etc.) citing catalysts like memory supercycle, bottlenecks, and AI tailwinds. Buy on 32 stocks including COIN, SMCI, GOOGL, and several crypto and drone plays. Questionable on VELO and SKYT due to weak fundamentals. Avoid on 11 stocks (UAVS, BKKT, PLTR, etc.) due to dilution, high debt, or overvaluation. Overall bullish on AI, memory, bottlenecks, made-in-America supply chains, and defense, with a long-term view until after midterms.
source βCoreWeave's deal with Nvidia is analogous to a casino giving more money to gamble, leading to increased debt that ultimately benefits Nvidia. CoreWeave is not a good long due to high debt and interest payments, while Nvidia is the better bet.
source βCoreweave is at high risk due to massive debt, making it harder to secure funding for GPU purchases, while peers have better financing structures.
source βThe user finds NBIS and CIFR very attractive, with NBIS being a combination of high-growth businesses (autonomous driving, Clickhouse, Toloka, edtech) with a core business of ~$7B ARR and long-term 20-30% EBIT margin guidance. CRWV is less convincing due to over $1.2B in debt interest eating into FCF, while others have low interest rates.
source βCoreweave is likely to go bankrupt due to high debt interest and GPU depreciation, making it a clear short.
source βCoreWeave faces significant debt payment burden of $1.25B+ annually, raising solvency concerns.
source βGPU availability drop across major clouds and increased capex by META, AMZN, GOOGL create demand shift to neoclouds (IREN, NBIS, CRWV) as they offer AI cloud services, benefitting from capacity constraints and new AI model demand.
source βGPU depreciation fears for neoclouds are alleviated as Jensen Huang states that older GPUs are increasing in price, combined with tailwinds from increased hyperscaler capex and overall demand, creating a strong bullish case for neocloud stocks.
source βGPUs owned by NBIS, CRWV, and IREN are appreciating in value, countering depreciation concerns and creating a tailwind.
source βRobinhood users are holding overhyped stocks (HIMS, DUOL, BMNR, CRWV, ASST) that are likely to drop 50-70%+ as market conditions sour.
source βComparative analysis of mining stocks: $RIOT, $WULF, $NBIS are structurally better than $CRWV and $IREN, but the latter two serve as better hedges in sector declines.
source βThe post compares NBIS, IREN, and CRWV in the neocloud market. The author argues NBIS is the clear winner due to better financing (NVDA funding, convertible notes), strong backlog from META/MSFT, and additional value from subsidiaries, while CRWV is at risk due to high debt interest and IREN faces dilution but may be accretive long-term. Near-term macro headwinds are noted.
source βBearish on IREN due to dilutive ATMs and GPU investments, and on CRWV despite software strengths because macro environment does not favor capex-heavy companies.
source βCompanies in the Neocloud segment that have already secured capacity and component orders, such as NBIS and CRWV, are likely to be major winners as hyperscaler buildout delays cause competition to stall.
source βNo qualifying thesis event for 45+ days.