๐Ÿ“‹ Questions Samsung's claim of having the best-performing HBM4 after NVIDIA placed additional HBM4 orders with SK Hynix, suggesting Samsung may be losing ground

medium convictionFirst mentioned Mar 3, 2026

Questions Samsung's claim of having the best-performing HBM4 after NVIDIA placed additional HBM4 orders with SK Hynix, suggesting Samsung may be losing ground.

Evidence & details
Evidence
  • +NVIDIA placed additional HBM4 orders with SK Hynix
  • +Post questions whether Samsung truly has the best-performing HBM4.
Catalysts
  • โšกNVIDIA HBM4 orders with SK Hynix
  • โšกPotential Samsung HBM4 performance issues.
Risks
  • โˆ’Samsung may still have competitive HBM4 products.
  • โˆ’Order allocation may not reflect performance alone.

Chart

Post Timeline ยท 1 posts

new thesismedium

@TBU12345678 NVIDIA has placed additional HBM4 orders with SK Hynix. Does Samsung really have the best-performing HBM4?

Thesis: Questions Samsung's claim of having the best-performing HBM4 after NVIDIA placed additional HBM4 orders with SK Hynix, suggesting Samsung may be losing ground.

Current Price
$65.21
via cornerstones
Return from entry
โ€”
entry Mar 3, 2026
Thesis Lifecycle
๐ŸŸข
openedMar 3, 2026

Samsung and SK Hynix can pass increased costs onto hyperscalers due to memory demand not being in a downturn like 2022, making the current dip a buying opportunity.

source โ†—
๐Ÿ“
updatedMar 8, 2026+1 conv

Fears over oil/LNG/helium disruptions for SK Hynix and Samsung are overblown; energy cost impact is minimal (sub-3% margin hit) and easily absorbed or passed through, making the recent selloff unjustified.

source โ†—
๐Ÿ“
updatedMay 28, 2026-1 conv

Questions Samsung's claim of having the best-performing HBM4 after NVIDIA placed additional HBM4 orders with SK Hynix, suggesting Samsung may be losing ground.

source โ†—